*4:2γινωσκεται f35 [67%] RP,HF,CP ¦ γινωσκετε A,B,C [25%] OC,TR,NU ¦ γινωσκομεν ℵ [8%] (Since most versions are based on TR or NU, we are used to the 2nd person, which may have contributed to the use of this passage as a ‘litmus’ test for demonization.)
†4:3ομολογει f35 ℵ (73.5%) RP,HF,CP ¦ 1 τον A,B (24.2%) OC,TR,NU ¦ omit sentence [homoioteleuton] (2%) ¦ one other variant (0.2%)
‡4:3χριστον f35 (91.4%) RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ — A,B (6%) NU ¦ κυριον ℵ (alone) ¦ omit sentence [homoioteleuton] (2%) ¦ two other variants (0.4%)
§4:3εν σαρκι εληλυθοτα f35 ℵ (94.8%) RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ — A,B (2.6%) NU ¦ omit sentence [homoioteleuton] (2%) ¦ three other variants (0.6%)
‡4:20μισει f35 048 [74%] ¦ μιση ℵA,B [26%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP,NU (The point of the argument hinges on the hating being fact, so the Indicative is correct.)
*4:20πως f35 A,048 (95.8%) RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ ου ℵB (4.2%) NU
γινωσκεται f35 [67%] RP,HF,CP ¦ γινωσκετε A,B,C [25%] OC,TR,NU ¦ γινωσκομεν ℵ [8%] (Since most versions are based on TR or NU, we are used to the 2nd person, which may have contributed to the use of this passage as a ‘litmus’ test for demonization.)
ομολογει f35 ℵ (73.5%) RP,HF,CP ¦ 1 τον A,B (24.2%) OC,TR,NU ¦ omit sentence [homoioteleuton] (2%) ¦ one other variant (0.2%)
χριστον f35 (91.4%) RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ — A,B (6%) NU ¦ κυριον ℵ (alone) ¦ omit sentence [homoioteleuton] (2%) ¦ two other variants (0.4%)
εν σαρκι εληλυθοτα f35 ℵ (94.8%) RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ — A,B (2.6%) NU ¦ omit sentence [homoioteleuton] (2%) ¦ three other variants (0.6%)
εκ rell ¦ — [30%]
ο θεος rell ¦ — [15%]
ηγαπησαμεν f35 A [98.2%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ ηγαπηκαμεν B [1.6%] NU ¦ ηγαπησεν ℵ
τετελειωμενη εστιν εν ημιν f35 (90.7%) RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ ~ 3412 A (7.9%) NU ¦ ~ 1342 ℵB (0.8%) ¦ three other variants (0.6%)
αν f35 ℵ,A [92.5%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ εαν B [7.5%] NU