†1:4εν f35 ℵ048v [97%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ 1 τη A,B,Cv [3%] NU
‡1:5εις τους f35 (90.1%) RP,HF,OC,TR,CP [2 (1.9%)] ¦ τουτο ℵA,B,C,048 (7.4%) NU ¦ two other variants (0.6%) (Is the reading of the eclectic text not inferior?)
‡1:11δε f35 [25%] TR ¦ — ℵA,B,C,048 [75%] RP,HF,OC,CP,NU (Would not John, a Jew, be more likely to write the conjunction?)
§1:12ὑπ f35 A,B,048 [99%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ υπο ℵC [1%] NU
*1:12οιδαμεν f35 (23%) CP ¦ οιδατε (61.5%) RP,HF,OC,TR ¦ οιδας ℵA,B,C,048 (15.1%) NU ¦ οιδα (0.4%) (Soden mentions Kr once in 2 John but not at all in 3 John, when he definitely should have. In 3 John 12 TuT lists ALL 78 basic f35 MSS (±0 to ±3) for οιδαμεν, but Soden does not mention Kr in support of this variant. Since he doesn’t mention Kr anywhere in 3 John, we should not trust his silence. The first person was unexpected and was changed to the expected second person—in the context I would say that the singular is a ‘better’ correction than the plural.)
†1:15ονομα rell ¦ 1 αμην [13%] CP [See the last footnote in Jude.]
τουτων rell ¦ ταυτης [10%]
εν f35 ℵ048v [97%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ 1 τη A,B,Cv [3%] NU
εις τους f35 (90.1%) RP,HF,OC,TR,CP [2 (1.9%)] ¦ τουτο ℵA,B,C,048 (7.4%) NU ¦ two other variants (0.6%) (Is the reading of the eclectic text not inferior?)
εγραψα f35 C [88%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ 1 τι ℵA(B) [2%] NU ¦ 1 αν 048 [10%]
υπομνησω rell ¦ υπομνησων CP
εκ rell ¦ — ℵ048 [20%]
δε f35 [25%] TR ¦ — ℵA,B,C,048 [75%] RP,HF,OC,CP,NU (Would not John, a Jew, be more likely to write the conjunction?)
ὑπ f35 A,B,048 [99%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ υπο ℵC [1%] NU
οιδαμεν f35 (23%) CP ¦ οιδατε (61.5%) RP,HF,OC,TR ¦ οιδας ℵA,B,C,048 (15.1%) NU ¦ οιδα (0.4%) (Soden mentions Kr once in 2 John but not at all in 3 John, when he definitely should have. In 3 John 12 TuT lists ALL 78 basic f35 MSS (±0 to ±3) for οιδαμεν, but Soden does not mention Kr in support of this variant. Since he doesn’t mention Kr anywhere in 3 John, we should not trust his silence. The first person was unexpected and was changed to the expected second person—in the context I would say that the singular is a ‘better’ correction than the plural.)